Showing posts with label Lance Armstrong. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lance Armstrong. Show all posts

Friday, January 9, 2015

The Weak In Sports...



We all have our moments, right? And in those moments we seem to get through each one, correct? I feel as though I can justify that statement by saying one thing; if you're reading this now then you, like me, have overcome something at one point or another in your lifetime.

Overcoming adversity, out smarting the competition, that's what fashions ones heart to acknowledge the greatness of sports. I am a sports fan from way back, but the sporting world has, from decade to decade, and year to year, changed. I enjoy anything competitive. I'd watch UCLA beat up USC in the thumb wrestling collegiate national championship if there was such a thing. I just love a good competition. However, I have to admit the one thing that turns me off is a tainted title. Sosa and McGuire, "Marion" Jones and Lance Armstrong, to me all huge let downs.

Lance Armstrong led the way for my decline in watching cycling. I still love to ride, but do not watch with near the enthusiasm as I once did, because of the tainted titles. Lance dealt a devastating blow to a few communities. In his cheating, he not only cheated the cycling world, but the great people and companies (Trek, Bontrager, and others) that manufactured bikes for him to compete earnestly, the honest competitors (few and far between seeing how asterisks plague the 7 years he has been forced to vacate), and the millions of cycling fans worldwide, but most of all Lance let down the community that battles cancer. Is that to say that they should give up hope, and no longer continue to fight, or even abandon "Livestrong?" Absolutely not! But the cheating knocked the wind out of a lot of good people.

Lance at that time was the 7 time, Tour de France champion, and championed Livestrong in the fight against cancer. People believed in him. People with cancer found hope through Lance. The people believed in their superman cyclist because he (Lance) fought and overcame every obstacle; the competition, the terrain, the elements, and his biggest rival and main foe, cancer! Then after years of investigating, things turned sour. Lance confessed to cheating through transfusions, and admitted that he took banned substances, and was denounced as the world's greatest cyclist of all time. The USADA finalized their investigation, and Lance went from hero to near zero, and was almost immediately labeled the biggest fraud in cycling history. With that turn of events, what would come next? Would his tribe and sponsors stay with a liar, stay with a fake, or would his community and remaining sponsors if any remained, try and understand his reasons for cheating and being human, or would they spimply abandon a liar, and a cheat? Lance's cheating was done while in competition, and costs him all 7 of his titles, fortune, and fame. Now let's take a peek at another example of drugs devastating the sports world, and look at the out of competition struggles of doping.

Do you remember, as Celtics fans, when Len Bias fatally OD'ed? That was a tragedy that I will not soon forget, if ever. I am as anti-Celtic as any "true" Lakers fan, but I am human first, and the humanitarian inside of me cringes with the memory of the news of Len Bias' heart succumbing to the nefarious, toxic ways of cocaine. Len Bias' death was as difficult as it was painful to hear. Len Bias' death was a most traumatic event to his family (both at home and on the court). It was tragic to come to the reality that such a great, young talent was gone way too soon.

Switching gears yet again, I turn to the here and now, and to the UFC. Mixed martial arts, like boxing has to adhere to the rules and regulations of the athletic commission when fighting within certain countries, provinces, or states. They like most professional sports have a list of banned substances. I mentioned the lethal usage of cocaine in the Len Bias tragedy, and now turn to Jon Jones usage of cocaine. Jon Jones was fortunate. Jon Jones was blessed not to fall victim to the same fate that Mr. Bias did. Jon (aka Bones) Jones in an interview (see above video), talked about the older guy in competition being unfair in using PED's (specifically TRT), and said that they (the older more experienced guys), should go home and raise their families and leave the sport if they had to cheat to compete. Once again, Bones Jones should count his blessings, because first of all, he still has life to enjoy, a life to spend with his family (a precious daughter), and team family. With the mention of his team, that leads me to the second point in counting his blessings. Jon Jones is still the champ, and was not even suspended, so he is still at the top of his division, and still making money to support his family, and speaking as a proud papa, still take care of that baby girl, his primary blessing. Therefore, with the proper management, and self-discipline, Bones could bounce back just as awesome if not newer and more improved than he was before the finding of drugs in his system on December 4th, 2105.

With all that said, I now ask you, what's worse, taking a performance enhancing drug, or taking a drug that's totally illegal anywhere in the country, and most of the free world? I am one that believes in second chances, but I also believe in justice. Bones has already had trouble in his young career, so is his voluntary admission into rehab a lesson learned, or another slap on the wrist that encourages him to fake his way through this fiasco until something fatal takes place for him as well? I say this in reference to his abusing of alcohol that contributed to the destruction of his new Bentley shortly after his winning the UFC Light Heavyweight Championship. Sadly enough, (if I recall correctly and I am humble enough to be corrected if incorrect), Bones was fined heavier for his skirmish with Daniel Cormier prior to their actual bout at UFC 182 than he was for the DUI incident. I pray that the rehab is truly rehab for Jon Jones, and that this is not just another cover up to help him walk into his next set back. The last thing that I want is for a child (possibly his own) that finds hope in Jon Jones to be as disgusted as I have been with the sporting world, and to a point of not even caring about sports. I used to embrace a challenge of any good, clean competition, and now I find myself sitting and waiting for the news of the next drug scandal, the next asterisk, or next title stripping. The unfortunate thing in all of this, is that doping, and drug use will continue for as long as there is an audience that doesn't care that it (doping, and drug abuse) exists. So long as there is cash flow, there is show flow. How many chances are you willing to give competitive sports? How long are you willing to stay away until the competition is true, clean competition? I won't be holding my breath, but I will be praying. My heart continues to go out to those in the fight against cancer, drug abuse, and alcoholism. Be blessed, and keep counting your blessings.


Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Armstrong's Statue of Liberty vs. USADA's Statute of Limitations



Professional Bicycling has consistently taken a black eye due to doping. Doping allegations left and right, have tarnished the image of professional bicycling. One would have to wonder how much more cycling can take until no one takes it seriously ever again. Especially the majors, like the Tour de France (TDF), the Giro d' Italia (The Giro), or the Vuelta de España (The Vuelta).

The UCI (International Cyclist Union) says that doping dates back as far as the 19th century and was used "to make the physical effort more tolerable, rather than to improve their performance." Rumor has it that dating back to 1896 that riders like Englishman Arthur Linton, who died from possible drug induced symptoms. Exhaustion and typhoid were given credit for the Welch riders death, with speculations that say drugs (caffeine, cocaine, and strychnine) were involved. That's a lethal combination, and bound to potentially make anyone's heart burst!

In the 1930's race founder, and author of L'Auto (paper/magazine publishing), Henri Desgrange was rumored to have written publicly, to the riders, after making changes to the TDF rule book, stating that drugs would not be complimentary, and that riders would be responsible for getting their own. With the way things are going in cycling now, would it just be easier to let riders dope, and call it survival of the fittest? I can only imagine how the viewing numbers would increase. "Doping allowed in the 2015 Tour!" I can almost see a morbid fan base taking bets on which rider would kill over first. I think that would be bet on more so than whom it was that would win the race.

However, it was said to be "common place" for riders to dope to make the physical effort more tolerable. Since then and highly due to the 1967 incident involving rider Tom Simpson, anti-doping took a serious turn. There was a "List of Prohibited Substances," put into place. The UCI states that the publication of the first "Medical Control Rules" was "the forerunner of the Anti-Doping Rules."
http://www.uci.ch/Modules/ENews/ENewsDetails.asp?id=MjMz&MenuId=MTYxNw&BackLink=/Templates/UCI/UCI5/layout.asp?MenuID=MTYxNw 

Miguel Indurain  won five consecutive Tour de France titles, from 1991-1995 (which at the time tied the record for most overall, and broke the record for consecutive Tour victories), was also accused of doping. Indurain was most likely accused because of his dominance during that time frame, but never tested positive.

Then the man that ended Indurain's reign (Bjarne Riis) admitted to doping, and said, ""My yellow jersey is in box at home, you can come and collect it," concerning his participation in the 1996 Tour. "What matters to me are my memories." http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/former-tour-de-france-winner-riis-admits-doping

Indurain, Riis, Ulrich, are just a few on a long, almost innumerable list of riders that have either tested positive, or been accused of doping.   Limitations (statutes) are mentioned, evidence is mentioned, and now even taxpayer money is now an issue. Mentioning taxpayer money brings up Senator Sensenbrenner from Wisconsin's fifth district. Not only have cheating riders, and the accusations from cycling's anti-doping agencies helped to give cycling a proverbial blackeye, but now it appears that a Wisconsin Senator is trying to make a bid, to defend a company that could very well be in his district in the upcoming year.

The case against Lance Armstrong is loosely linked to Wisconsin, because of Trek. Taking Contador's title may not tarnish Trek's image as badly, or lessen its prowess in the sport, but take Armstrong's seven Tour titles, and now you've cut that company deep. It may not severe an artery that is unstoppable, but it does leave a very deep wound, that will bleed out heavily. I have to admit that I looked into the borders of District 5 to see if Senator Sensenbrenner had a paid dog in the fight, and Waterloo is not in his immediate territory. It is however, still in his state. Plus, and I know one can't rely on hearsay, but is it true that a Trek facility in Whitewater, Wisconsin would soon be in Senator Sensenbrenner's district? Will this Whitewater plant actually be in his district this fall, or is that just another attempt of a lying portion of the opposition trying to be just as misleading as the government that they are speaking out against?

The sport of cycling needs a boost, not another blackeye. Groups ride out five or six minutes ahead of the peleton, and then the peleton reels them back in. You might have a sprinters finish in a few stages that might present excitement in some stages, but other than that, only the time trials seem to present any real excitement, or climactic finish. As Sean Kelly said in this years Tour: radios have taken away from the riders since of urgency concerning breakaways. Some riders seem more apt and capable of making up ground faster than others also.

French rider Rémy Di Gregorio, of team Cofidis was taken into custody from his hotel room by the authorities before Stage 10 of this years Tour, for allegedly doping. He was dismissed from his duties from Cofidis as well. Of course this is a man that went from one-hundered and seventy-fifth place, More than just a handful of minutes down to the race leader, and moved into thirty-third place in eight days. In most cycling events and circumstances, that's a bit beyond lucky. Any rider that does something so superhuman and freakish beyond reality, should expect that they are going to be tested. They have no worries if they are clean. If not, they should, like Di Gregorio, be taken into custody.

I have to admit that I am not a huge Lance Armstrong supporter. I think what he has done for cancer research is fabulous, however, in that I am a huge fan. I understand that big names usually have big egos to match the name, but being rude and overly egotistical is another thing. Fan or not, though, he was a very talented athlete, and king of the Tour after his cancer was overcome. Armstrong said that he was notified by the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) last week about doping allegations brought up against him. These are charges that he has faced before, and charges that were dropped by Federal Investigators. Armstrong borught up some points that were very interesting: "These are the very same charges and the same witnesses that the Justice Department chose not to pursue after a two-year investigation." He also said, "Although USADA alleges a wide-ranging conspiracy extended over more than 16 years, I am the only athlete it has chosen to charge."
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/armstrong-charged-with-doping-by-usada

So why would the USADA pursue events that have already been dismissed by Federal Investigators, and not pursue the teammates or other riders that were involved?




"These charges are baseless, motivated by spite and advanced through testimony bought and paid for by promises of anonymity and immunity."


"I have never doped, and, unlike many of my accusers, I have competed as an endurance athlete for 25 years with no spike in performance, passed more than 500 drug tests and never failed one. That USADA ignores this fundamental distinction and charges me instead of the admitted dopers says far more about USADA, its lack of fairness and this vendetta than it does about my guilt or innocence." Lance Armstrong

500 tests and never failed, or tested positive once, and now this same group of witnesses and the USADA get a crack at him? How many times can you accuse, or try someone, and for how long? If someone is guilty, then they should be punished, but at what length does one go to prove someone guilty when so many others have already proven one innocent? Two years with the Justice Department, and still nothing?

The USADA says that Armstrong was involved in a conspiracy dating back to to 1998, and it comes forward to current date. The USADA says because of that, they have no limits and jurisdiction over Armstrong's case, and career.
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/us-congressman-questions-role-of-usada-in-armstrong-case?ns_campaign=news&ns_mchannel=rss&ns_source=cyclingnews&ns_linkname=0&ns_fee=0

If Armstrong retired, and the Justice Department, and Federal Investigators abandoned this case, and Armstrong has passed over 500 tests, what's left to prove? The only thing left to prove is that there needs to be a vast improvement in testing. Cycling can't survive at this rate.

Wednesday, July 6, 2011



July five, Stage Four, and Alberto Contador had a strong ride today in the Tour de France. He is trying to overcome a deficit of approximately one minute and forty-two seconds. Which for a rider that climbs well, sprints well, and is an overall beast on a bicycle is not impossible to do. The deficit that will be the most grueling to overcome for Contador is the one he has with the fans of cycling. Losing trust, and falling behind in the integrity department is a tough hole to dig oneself out of. However, again not impossible to do. Still a lot of racing to do. How horrible would it be though to win GC (General Classification) honors, be the fastest man in the race and then have your title stripped because of doping. I pray that he is clean, but if they took the title from Landis then what's fair is fair. The trust lost will be hard for fans to gain back. I believe in second chances, but the A-Rods and Contador's leave a bad taste in your mouth. Just come clean, admit you were wrong and move forward. I can learn to love ya again if you admit your guilt, apologize, and serve your time. Time away from your sport is another difficult deficit to overcome, ask Mr. Ali about that one!
Published with Blogger-droid v1.7.2

Monday, May 17, 2010

Steady Rollin' Trekin' Right Along!















I hear Trek, and I think of two things:

1. James T. Kirk and the Starship Enterprise
2. A Wisconsin born bicycle company!

I am starting to dig the bike above. It's Trek's 1.1. It needs a bigger chain ring for my need to do 65-70mph on the downside of Chestoa, but on the other hand, I could use that smaller ring, and a granny gear for the climb back up since I am in horrendous shape! Did I mention that the Carrera Blue is an eye catcher as well, or that the entry level price is nicer than that of the Madone Series? Yes, Mr. Armstrong you can send me one if you really feel that generous, but I will not hold you to that! Plus you have already told me that I couldn't talk to you about how I'm not religious, but very spiritual. Lol. Imperfect may not be my middle name, but it is who I am until the day of perfecting. I credit my doctor's for a lot of healing, but I credit the Great Physician with blessing those gifted hands, and minds that have helped me along the way. When I felt as though I couldn't cope, He made a way, even when the doctors, lawyers, and friends had given up on me. For that I truly am thankful.